<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help me Landscape Dan&#8217;s New Building</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261</link>
	<description>Susan Harris&#039;s blog about eco-friendly and urban gardening, plus the adventures of a DC-based garden writer, coach and occasional rabble-rowser.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 11:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: melody</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>melody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablegardeningblog.com/?p=261#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Hot Cocoa Roses; bring that great brick/orange/red down from the top of the building.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot Cocoa Roses; bring that great brick/orange/red down from the top of the building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bev</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablegardeningblog.com/?p=261#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>I am thinking of winter interest also; how about picking up the red at the top with winterberry hollies and/or red twig dogwoods? They both like damp areas, though....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking of winter interest also; how about picking up the red at the top with winterberry hollies and/or red twig dogwoods? They both like damp areas, though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam L</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablegardeningblog.com/?p=261#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what compost is for. We had mostly clay  and originally brought in top soil but for everything I add to the garden/landscape, even now, 5 years later, I still buy a bag of compost and mix it half and half when planting. You can&#039;t buy enough top soil when it&#039;s this bad and you have to let it grow in some of the native soil or it won&#039;t spread it&#039;s roots from the original root ball.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what compost is for. We had mostly clay  and originally brought in top soil but for everything I add to the garden/landscape, even now, 5 years later, I still buy a bag of compost and mix it half and half when planting. You can&#8217;t buy enough top soil when it&#8217;s this bad and you have to let it grow in some of the native soil or it won&#8217;t spread it&#8217;s roots from the original root ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 06:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablegardeningblog.com/?p=261#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>All I have to say is MORE SOIL. 6&quot; wasn&#039;t enough to help my terrible builder-abused soil when we bought this house, unless you intend to get enough to also refill the holes for the larger plants that will be planted deeper than 6&quot;. I also found that what a landscaper calls 6&quot; is really just 3&quot; once it&#039;s rained on a couple of times.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I have to say is MORE SOIL. 6&#8243; wasn&#8217;t enough to help my terrible builder-abused soil when we bought this house, unless you intend to get enough to also refill the holes for the larger plants that will be planted deeper than 6&#8243;. I also found that what a landscaper calls 6&#8243; is really just 3&#8243; once it&#8217;s rained on a couple of times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher C in Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher C in Hawaii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 02:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablegardeningblog.com/?p=261#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>The natural progression in that color lineup is blue.

This is a commercial building. It is likely to get next to no maintenance, so whatever goes in needs to be very tough and stand up to the wear and tear of city life. This ain&#039;t Grandma&#039;s garden.

The building architecture is minimalist except for the color and the vertical lines in the siding. The stone first floor has horizontal lines.

I see three species of tough perennial small shrubs or very durable perennial flowers in the blue green leaf color range and maybe having blue flowers or berries. No grasses because I don&#039;t want the vertical lines they create.

These three species are to be planted in single species horizontal stripes across the front of the building, crossing the entry walkway to the right hand bed and hopefully an upper right hand bed where I see a telephone pole as continuous stripes. There needs to be significant foliage texture difference between the plants that make up the stripes.

This I think will give the building the effect of a wide base to rest on so the color stripes on the building don&#039;t pull the eye too harshly skyward as well as work with the theme of the building.

There will need to be one taller element in the right front bed by the utility meters to screen those and help balance the tree on the left and break up that wall a bit.

That&#039;s the concept anyway.

I don&#039;t knows much bout Yankee shrubberies yet so you&#039;ll have to think what will work from there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The natural progression in that color lineup is blue.</p>
<p>This is a commercial building. It is likely to get next to no maintenance, so whatever goes in needs to be very tough and stand up to the wear and tear of city life. This ain&#8217;t Grandma&#8217;s garden.</p>
<p>The building architecture is minimalist except for the color and the vertical lines in the siding. The stone first floor has horizontal lines.</p>
<p>I see three species of tough perennial small shrubs or very durable perennial flowers in the blue green leaf color range and maybe having blue flowers or berries. No grasses because I don&#8217;t want the vertical lines they create.</p>
<p>These three species are to be planted in single species horizontal stripes across the front of the building, crossing the entry walkway to the right hand bed and hopefully an upper right hand bed where I see a telephone pole as continuous stripes. There needs to be significant foliage texture difference between the plants that make up the stripes.</p>
<p>This I think will give the building the effect of a wide base to rest on so the color stripes on the building don&#8217;t pull the eye too harshly skyward as well as work with the theme of the building.</p>
<p>There will need to be one taller element in the right front bed by the utility meters to screen those and help balance the tree on the left and break up that wall a bit.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the concept anyway.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t knows much bout Yankee shrubberies yet so you&#8217;ll have to think what will work from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam L</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablegardeningblog.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 01:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablegardeningblog.com/?p=261#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>I agree with the red and orange coloring, in whatever varities works there, along with the grasses. I think having reds and oranges would &quot;ground&quot; it because of the red being at the top of the building and right now the white of the bottom kind of leaves it floating in a way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the red and orange coloring, in whatever varities works there, along with the grasses. I think having reds and oranges would &#8220;ground&#8221; it because of the red being at the top of the building and right now the white of the bottom kind of leaves it floating in a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
